Columns / Discourse / October 10, 2012

Debating columnists: Victor in Presidential debates

This article was originally published in The College Conservative.


Mitt Romney outperformed President Obama. He looked confident, knowledgeable, energetic, optimistic and even empathetic — something that he has struggled with since the release of the leaked 47 percent video. Indeed, CNN conducted a poll of those who watched the debate and found that 67 of respondents believed that Romney won. But Romney won not because he became a debate superstar. Romney is a good debater and has been for a while but Romney won because Obama was flat.


Our president couldn’t spell out the successes of his first term. It’s hard to tell if there are any if he couldn’t spell them out in last week’s debate. He has no plan for the next four years. The only thing that the American people got from last night’s debate is that Obama will increase taxes on the wealthy and let the Bush tax cuts expire even though he extended them during his presidency. That’s not a vision for the next four years.


Say what you want about Bush Tax cuts, but letting them expire won’t just hit rich people like Donald Trump. This tax hike would hit small businesses, which account for 20 million enterprises throughout the U.S.  Small businesses account for 70 percent of America’s employment. Let’s be honest, is it smart to raise taxes on those who create the vast majority of our jobs?


This isn’t rocket science. You don’t have to be a small business owner to understand that higher taxes strain enterprise. Higher taxes increase costs for businesses, which is something that our country must avoid, especially since the unemployment rate is still under a malaise level at 7.8 percent. Unemployment is under 8 percent, which seems like a good sign but the jobs added to the economy do not account for population growth. The youth unemployment rate still remains at 17 percent.


However, the most important key to this economic puzzle is the current situation of the middle class. Obama and Romney both agree that the middle class is an essential foundation for our country. But how has the middle class done in the last four years? How have the not-so-wealthy done under Obama’s administration? Well, Vice President Biden couldn’t have said it any better, the middle class has been “buried” over the last four years.


Look at some of the numbers. The middle class is struggling with property value. In September, an Associated Press poll found that 36 percent of likely voters believe that their family situation has worsened in the last four years especially those who have a family income less than $100,000. Another poll shows that a staggering 85 percent of middle class families feel that they are worse off than a decade ago.


This isn’t surprising. Gas prices increased dramatically during Obama’s four years. Gas prices increased 103.79 percent under Obama in the last four years. Groceries increased as well, from milk to bread to eggs and even toilet paper. Rent also went up and college tuition — well, that unfortunately has gone up. Families are not feeling better. The Federal Reserve study couldn’t put it any better, the family net worth dropped to the lowest since 1992.


Obama hasn’t helped the middle class. He has helped his buddies like the United Auto Workers (UAW) with the auto bailout, which gave the union $26.5 billion in order to keep outrageously high wages like $75.86 an hour. He also helped his friends on Wall Street, where they reached record profits under his administration compared to President Bush’s eight years. What has he done in the last four years that has helped everyday Americans? Not so much. He has helped the wealthy and the few in the Democratic base like the unions and has left behind most of the country.


He has especially let down those 46.7 million Americans who depend on food stamps. That’s a record number in our country’s history. This country was founded in the idea that you can make it big and be independent. Yet, because of stagnant unemployment and policies that created uncertainty throughout businesses, a lot of Americans resort to government help.


The last four years have clearly not worked. A new vision is needed and Mitt Romney has a different plan of action that will help most Americans, not just the ones on Wall Street and the ones that have their companies close to bankruptcy.


The Romney-Ryan plan specifics must be looked at. One of them is that it will keep taxes low just like they were under the Bush period. The one difference is that Romney will cut spending instead of increasing it while cutting taxes which is why Obama inherited a terrible deficit. After all, Romney did balance the budget without raising taxes as Governor of Massachusetts.  He worked with Democrats to do that something that Obama hasn’t done in his four years.


There are two different visions. And it’s time to choose. Looking at the numbers, are you better off than you were four years ago? Should this country go through four more years with this president?

Tags:  debates election obama President romney

Bookmark and Share

Previous Post
Debating columnists: Victor in presidential debates
Next Post
Chávez to serve fourth term as Venezuelan president

Alex Uzarowicz
Alex Uzarowicz has been a weekly conservative political columnist for The Knox Student for three years. He also writes for The College Conservative. Alex will graduate in June 2013 with a degree in political science, after which he will head abroad to begin his Peace Corps service.

You might also like

1 Comment

Oct 13, 2012

I personally feel President Obama has done a lot for everyday Americans in supporting the rights of individuals and working to ensure that health insurance companies cover pre-existing conditions. On the other hand, Paul Ryan voted against the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Mitt Romney has pledged to defund Planned Parenthood and cut funding for the National Endowment for the Arts along with Public Television. Defunding non-profit organizations and voting against a law that helps women to fight for equal pay is not what I would consider helpful or promising in a candidate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Story
Debating columnists: Victor in presidential debates
Like many Americans, I’ve become increasingly frustrated with the presidential election as we move closer to voting day. ...